Waddell v. State
863 S.W.2d 6, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 1993 WL 375987
Opinion
ORDER
We find the findings of fact issued by the motion court in overruling Defendant’s 24.-035 motion were not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waddell v. State, 863 S.W.2d 6, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 1993 WL 375987 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
863 S.W.2d 6 (Waddell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.