Waddell v. Holbrook Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Waddell v. Holbrook Co.

147 So. 213, 146 So. 668, 108 Fla. 332

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 147 So. 213 (Waddell v. Holbrook Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waddell v. Holbrook Co., 147 So. 213, 146 So. 668, 108 Fla. 332 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinions

The above cause being now before the Court upon a writ of error from the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Orange County, Florida, and having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, and this Court having seen and inspected the record, and finding no reversible error therein, now being advised of its opinion to be therein rendered, the said cause is hereby affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, and BUFORD, J. J., and ROWE, C. J., concur.

TERRELL and BROWN, J. J., dissent.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The above cause being now before the Court upon a writ of error from the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Orange County, Florida, and having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, and this Court having seen and inspected the record, and finding no reversible error therein, now being advised of its opinion to be therein rendered, the said cause is hereby affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, and BUFORD, J. J., and ROWE, C. J., concur.

TERRELL and BROWN, J. J., dissent.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 So. 213, 146 So. 668, 108 Fla. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waddell-v-holbrook-co-fla-1933.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack