Waddell v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Waddell v. City of Atlanta

132 S.E.2d 137, 108 Ga. App. 103, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 558

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 25, 1963

Docket40184

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E.2d 137 (Waddell v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waddell v. City of Atlanta, 132 S.E.2d 137, 108 Ga. App. 103, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 558 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. In a joint and several tort action against several defendants the judgment sustaining special demurrers filed by one of the defendants with leave to amend is not reviewable by this court. Code Ann. § 81-1001 and cases cited under catchword “Demurrers.”

2. In such an action the judgment sustaining special demurrers of another defendant, the grounds of which were multifariousness and misjoinder of parties defendant, is not a final judgment reviewable by this court. In such a case the plaintiff has an election (1) by amendment to strike such causes of [104]*104action and parties defendant as will meet the judgment on demurrers or (2) to refuse to amend, invoke a final judgment dismissing the actions and have reviewed the final judgment dismissing the actions and the antecedent judgment requiring the election as to causes of action and parties defendant. Spence v. Rodgers, 61 Ga. App. 854 (7 SE2d 787). “Misj oinder of parties or causes of action must be taken advantage of by special demurrer, and is not ground for general demurrer.” Waters v. DeKalb County, 208 Ga. 741 (3) (69 SE2d 274).

Decided June 25, 1963. Oze R. Horton, Charles W. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Mwrphy, Lokey & Bowden, Charles M. Lokey, Edward E. Dorsey, John T. Marshall, contra.

Since there is no final judgment and since the action is still pending in the trial court as to all of the defendants the writ of error must be dismissed. Bagley v. Bagley, 194 Ga. 154 (20 SE2d 760).

Writ of error dismissed.

Eberhardt and Russell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. In a joint and several tort action against several defendants the judgment sustaining special demurrers filed by one of the defendants with leave to amend is not reviewable by this court. Code Ann. § 81-1001 and cases cited under catchword “Demurrers.”

2. In such an action the judgment sustaining special demurrers of another defendant, the grounds of which were multifariousness and misjoinder of parties defendant, is not a final judgment reviewable by this court. In such a case the plaintiff has an election (1) by amendment to strike such causes of [104]*104action and parties defendant as will meet the judgment on demurrers or (2) to refuse to amend, invoke a final judgment dismissing the actions and have reviewed the final judgment dismissing the actions and the antecedent judgment requiring the election as to causes of action and parties defendant. Spence v. Rodgers, 61 Ga. App. 854 (7 SE2d 787). “Misj oinder of parties or causes of action must be taken advantage of by special demurrer, and is not ground for general demurrer.” Waters v. DeKalb County, 208 Ga. 741 (3) (69 SE2d 274).

Decided June 25, 1963. Oze R. Horton, Charles W. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Mwrphy, Lokey & Bowden, Charles M. Lokey, Edward E. Dorsey, John T. Marshall, contra.

Since there is no final judgment and since the action is still pending in the trial court as to all of the defendants the writ of error must be dismissed. Bagley v. Bagley, 194 Ga. 154 (20 SE2d 760).

Writ of error dismissed.

Eberhardt and Russell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.E.2d 137, 108 Ga. App. 103, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waddell-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack