Wacker-Wabash Corp. v. City of Chicago
311 U.S. 606, 61 S. Ct. 14
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Snell, 193 U. S. 30, 36; Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 421, 427.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wacker-Wabash Corp. v. City of Chicago, 311 U.S. 606, 61 S. Ct. 14 (1940).
311 U.S. 606 (Wacker-Wabash Corp. v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Backus
154 U.S. 421 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa
160 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. Snell
193 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1904)