Wacker v. Straub

88 Pa. 32, 1878 Pa. LEXIS 211
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 18, 1878·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The judgment of the Supremo Court Avas entered November 18th 1878,

Pur Curiam.

It does not appear from any evidence in the cause (none being printed) that the question as to the sewer became material. The objection as to irrelevancy must therefore prevail. A plaintiff in error must show by the record how the evidence became material, for if it, to all appearance, has no connection with the matter on trial, the presumption- is that the court below was right.

We discover no error as to the interest under tho facts stated.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Trunkdy filed a dissenting opinion as to the interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wacker v. Straub, 88 Pa. 32, 1878 Pa. LEXIS 211 (Pa. 1878).

88 Pa. 32 (Wacker v. Straub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rearick v. Elderton State Bank
97 A.3d 374 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Chrysler First Business Credit Corp. v. Gourniak
601 A.2d 338 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Overly v. Kass
554 A.2d 970 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Del Turco v. Peoples Home Savings Ass'n
478 A.2d 456 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Warden v. Zanella
423 A.2d 1026 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Joseph
406 A.2d 1055 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Tyson v. Eyrick
21 A. 635 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)