Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal

Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal

624 So. 2d 867, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10318, 1993 WL 405178
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1853
StatusPublished

This text of 624 So. 2d 867 (Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal, 624 So. 2d 867, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10318, 1993 WL 405178 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Wackenhut Corporation and Scott, Wetzel & Associates raise several issues on appeal of a final order of a judge of compensation claims (JCC). We find that only one has merit. The JCC erred in including the employer’s contribution for uniforms in calculating the average weekly wage (AWW). See Rudd Sod Co. v. Reeves, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The case is, therefore, reversed and remanded for recalculation of the AWW. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RUDD SOD COMPANY v. Reeves
595 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 So. 2d 867, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10318, 1993 WL 405178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wackenhut-corp-v-oneal-fladistctapp-1993.