Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal

624 So. 2d 867, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10318, 1993 WL 405178

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 1993·No. No. 92-1853·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Wackenhut Corporation and Scott, Wetzel & Associates raise several issues on appeal of a final order of a judge of compensation claims (JCC). We find that only one has merit. The JCC erred in including the employer’s contribution for uniforms in calculating the average weekly wage (AWW). See Rudd Sod Co. v. Reeves, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The case is, therefore, reversed and remanded for recalculation of the AWW. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Wackenhut Corporation and Scott, Wetzel & Associates raise several issues on appeal of a final order of a judge of compensation claims (JCC). We find that only one has merit. The JCC erred in including the employer’s contribution for uniforms in calculating the average weekly wage (AWW). See Rudd Sod Co. v. Reeves, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The case is, therefore, reversed and remanded for recalculation of the AWW. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal, 624 So. 2d 867, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10318, 1993 WL 405178 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

624 So. 2d 867 (Wackenhut Corp. v. O'Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related