Wack v. Cohen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wack v. Cohen

323 S.W.3d 458, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1436, 2010 WL 4195815

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 2010·No. ED 94311·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Suzanne Wack (Client) appeals the judgment of the circuit court after it granted directed verdict in favor of Nathan Cohen (Lawyer) in an action for legal malpractice.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Suzanne Wack (Client) appeals the judgment of the circuit court after it granted directed verdict in favor of Nathan Cohen (Lawyer) in an action for legal malpractice.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Wack v. Cohen, 323 S.W.3d 458, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1436, 2010 WL 4195815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

323 S.W.3d 458 (Wack v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related