Wachtel v. Reichel

Ohio Circuit Courts

Wachtel v. Reichel

19 Ohio C.C. 626

DecidedOctober 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ohio C.C. 626 (Wachtel v. Reichel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wachtel v. Reichel, 19 Ohio C.C. 626 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Giffen, J.

The action below was in replevin to recover possession of a printing press, upon the ground of a fraudulent purchase. The only testimony offered was that of the seller and buyer, together with a memorandum of sale and a letter from the latter. Manifestly the press was sold on time, and upon delivery the title passed. Although the vendee was at the time insolvent, no representations as to his financial condition were made, and the court must have found that he intended to pay and had reasonable expectations of being able to pay; which finding upon the evidence,we are not warranted in disturbing.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giffen, J.

The action below was in replevin to recover possession of a printing press, upon the ground of a fraudulent purchase. The only testimony offered was that of the seller and buyer, together with a memorandum of sale and a letter from the latter. Manifestly the press was sold on time, and upon delivery the title passed. Although the vendee was at the time insolvent, no representations as to his financial condition were made, and the court must have found that he intended to pay and had reasonable expectations of being able to pay; which finding upon the evidence,we are not warranted in disturbing.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ohio C.C. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wachtel-v-reichel-ohiocirct-1899.