Wachtel v. James Wilde, Jr., & Co.
58 Ga. 50
Opinion
The facts of this case reported above, show that it is very similar to the case of Cohen vs. Myers et al., in 42 Ga. 46; [54]*54and we think that here, as there, all the equities can be better settled on the trial on the merits, and we will not control the discretion of the chancellor in granting the injunction and appointing a receiver.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wachtel v. James Wilde, Jr., & Co., 58 Ga. 50 (Ga. 1877).
58 Ga. 50 (Wachtel v. James Wilde, Jr., & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanford v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
43 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Wolfe v. Claflin & Co.
6 S.E. 599 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)