Wachtel v. Fraut

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wachtel v. Fraut

122 N.Y.S. 1149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 122 N.Y.S. 1149 (Wachtel v. Fraut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wachtel v. Fraut, 122 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

8BABURY, J.

The action was brought up-a promissory note. The defendants pleaded general denial, fraud, no consideration, and counterclaim of $430. The note,, which was r $100 was given by the defendant Louis .•aut to the plaintiff. It was given in part yment for certain chattels, which by bill of le bearing even date with the note the plain-f made to the defendant Louis Fraut. The stimony disclosed by the record is not clear satisfactory, and it is evident from a review it that the defendant did not sustain any of ; defenses to the note. Judgment reversed, id new trial ordered, with costs to appellant abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8BABURY, J.

The action was brought up-a promissory note. The defendants pleaded general denial, fraud, no consideration, and counterclaim of $430. The note,, which was r $100 was given by the defendant Louis .•aut to the plaintiff. It was given in part yment for certain chattels, which by bill of le bearing even date with the note the plain-f made to the defendant Louis Fraut. The stimony disclosed by the record is not clear satisfactory, and it is evident from a review it that the defendant did not sustain any of ; defenses to the note. Judgment reversed, id new trial ordered, with costs to appellant abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wachtel-v-fraut-nyappdiv-1910.