Wachtel-Schuh Horse Co. v. Hamilton Trust Co.
173 A.D. 950, 158 N.Y.S. 1134
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 173 A.D. 950 (Wachtel-Schuh Horse Co. v. Hamilton Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wachtel-Schuh Horse Co. v. Hamilton Trust Co., 173 A.D. 950, 158 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., concurred upon the ground that the finding in the action by Cyrus Rheims,
See Rheims y. Bracken-McAveney Co. (151 App. Div. 14).—[Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rheims v. Bracken-McAveney Co.
151 A.D. 14 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 950, 158 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wachtel-schuh-horse-co-v-hamilton-trust-co-nyappdiv-1916.