Wacht v. Jackel
This text of Wacht v. Jackel (Wacht v. Jackel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DONALD WACHT, § § Petitioner Below– § No. 83, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below–Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § MELISSA JACKEL, § File No. CN18-05563 § Petition No. 18-28833 Respondent Below– § Appellee. § §
Submitted: June 24, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019
ORDER
It appears to the Court that, on June 4, 2019, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a
notice, via certified mail, to the appellant, Donald Wacht, to show cause why his
appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and appendix.
Wacht received the notice to show cause on June 11, 2019, but did not respond to it,
and has not filed an opening brief. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore deemed to
be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wacht v. Jackel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wacht-v-jackel-del-2019.