Wachsmuth v. State
917 So. 2d 375, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366, 2005 WL 3555712
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s criminal judgment and sentence. However, we reverse the imposition of the public defender lien because the trial court failed to inform appellant of his right to contest the amount of the lien before imposition. See Saunders v. State, 863 So.2d 458, 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Upon remand, appellant should be afforded the opportunity to have a hearing to contest the amount of the public defender lien.
[376] AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wachsmuth v. State, 917 So. 2d 375, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366, 2005 WL 3555712 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
917 So. 2d 375 (Wachsmuth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saunders v. State
863 So. 2d 458 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)