Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wachsmuth v. State

Wachsmuth v. State

917 So. 2d 375, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366, 2005 WL 3555712
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-1638
StatusPublished

This text of 917 So. 2d 375 (Wachsmuth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wachsmuth v. State, 917 So. 2d 375, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366, 2005 WL 3555712 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s criminal judgment and sentence. However, we reverse the imposition of the public defender lien because the trial court failed to inform appellant of his right to contest the amount of the lien before imposition. See Saunders v. State, 863 So.2d 458, 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Upon remand, appellant should be afforded the opportunity to have a hearing to contest the amount of the public defender lien.

[376]*376AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saunders v. State
863 So. 2d 458 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
917 So. 2d 375, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366, 2005 WL 3555712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wachsmuth-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.