Wachsman v. Hethering
31 A.D.2d 522, 294 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 14, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment after nonjury trial in favor of plaintiffs, unanimously modified, on the law, by striking therefrom the item of property damage in the amount of $875, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. 'The estimate for repairs was not admissible without supporting proof of the value of the car prior to the occurrence. (Gass v. Agate Ice Cream, 264 N. Y. 141.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Tilzer, McGivern and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wachsman v. Hethering, 31 A.D.2d 522, 294 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).
31 A.D.2d 522 (Wachsman v. Hethering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Underweiser v. Gans
153 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)