Wachsman v. Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad

170 A.D. 920, 154 N.Y.S. 1149

This text of 170 A.D. 920 (Wachsman v. Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wachsman v. Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad, 170 A.D. 920, 154 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the damages for the physical injury to plaintiff’s eye are inadequate. We think that the issue as made by the pleadings did not entitle plaintiff to recover for any loss of earnings in her business. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A.D. 920, 154 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wachsman-v-brooklyn-union-elevated-railroad-nyappdiv-1915.