Wachsman v. Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad
This text of 170 A.D. 920 (Wachsman v. Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the damages for the physical injury to plaintiff’s eye are inadequate. We think that the issue as made by the pleadings did not entitle plaintiff to recover for any loss of earnings in her business. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D. 920, 154 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wachsman-v-brooklyn-union-elevated-railroad-nyappdiv-1915.