Wachlin v. Town of Glencoe
43 N.W. 967, 41 Minn. 499, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 394
Opinion
Assuming, as we may from both the record and the brief of counsel, that the court below granted a new trial on the [500]*500ground that the verdict was not justified by the evidence, the case is clearly within the rule, so often laid down by this court, that we will not reverse such an order unless we are satisfied that the preponderance of the evidence is manifestly and palpably in its favor.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wachlin v. Town of Glencoe, 43 N.W. 967, 41 Minn. 499, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 394 (Mich. 1889).
43 N.W. 967 (Wachlin v. Town of Glencoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Estate of Tobin
3 Coffey 538 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)