Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 2010·No. PD-1397-09·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-1397-09


MITCHELL E. WACHHOLTZ, Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS




ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

LUBBOCK COUNTY




           Per curiam. Keasler and hervey, JJ., dissent.



ORDER

           The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the petition is longer than fifteen (15) pages.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas within thirty (30) days after the date of this order.


En banc.


Delivered: February 3, 2010

Do Not Publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin, (Tex. 2010).

Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin (Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.