Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin
This text of Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin (Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. PD-1397-09
MITCHELL E. WACHHOLTZ, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS
LUBBOCK COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler and hervey, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the petition is longer than fifteen (15) pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas within thirty (30) days after the date of this order.
En banc.
Delivered: February 3, 2010
Do Not Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wachholtz, Mitchell Erin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wachholtz-mitchell-erin-texcrimapp-2010.