Wacaser v. State

122 S.E. 908, 32 Ga. App. 354, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 391
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1924
Docket15413
StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 908 (Wacaser v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wacaser v. State, 122 S.E. 908, 32 Ga. App. 354, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Beoyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the usual-general grounds; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. J. A. Brahe, P. Z. Beer, for plaintiff in error. P. B. Rich, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 908, 32 Ga. App. 354, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wacaser-v-state-gactapp-1924.