Wabberson v. Wabberson

27 Misc. 125, 57 N.Y.S. 405
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 Misc. 125 (Wabberson v. Wabberson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wabberson v. Wabberson, 27 Misc. 125, 57 N.Y.S. 405 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

Giegerich, J.

The case of Lee v. Lee, 4 Civ. Pro. 321, is a direct authority for the allowance to the wife of alimony pendente lite, and counsel fees to enable her to defend an action brought by the husband -to annul a marriage. The principle upon which such allowance was made was thus clearly stated by the court in Brinkley v. Brinkley, 50 N. Y. 190, 193 Where an actual marital relation has been admitted or shown, and its existence is sought to be avoided by some fact set up by the husband and it devolves upon him to show that fact, alimony will be granted until that fact is shown.” This case, in its facts, comes directly within the above rule, and after reading the motion papers, I conclude that the defendant should have a counsel fee of $30, to enable her to defend the action, and $4 per week during the pendency thereof ;for the support of herself and the two children of the marriage. The counsel fee may be paid in weekly installments of $3 each.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willits v. Willits
107 N.W. 379 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
Anderson v. Matthews
58 P. 898 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Misc. 125, 57 N.Y.S. 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wabberson-v-wabberson-nysupct-1899.