Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/W.A. Bayer Realtors, Inc. v. W. E. Pearse, Inc.

W.A. Bayer Realtors, Inc. v. W. E. Pearse, Inc.

256 A.D.2d 1164, 682 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14293
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 1164 (W.A. Bayer Realtors, Inc. v. W. E. Pearse, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W.A. Bayer Realtors, Inc. v. W. E. Pearse, Inc., 256 A.D.2d 1164, 682 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment. Because the parties’ agreement is ambiguous and “determination of the intent of the parties depends on the credibility of extrinsic evidence or on a choice among reasonable inferences to be drawn from extrinsic evidence,” summary judgment is inappropriate (Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v Wesolowski, 33 NY2d 169, 172).

[1165]*1165(Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisher v. A.W. Miller Technical Sales, Inc.
306 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Hamburg v. American Ref-Fuel Co.
284 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D.2d 1164, 682 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wa-bayer-realtors-inc-v-w-e-pearse-inc-nyappdiv-1998.