W82780 & W98474 Keith Saunders v. Adp Totalsource Fi Xi, Inc. (In re Appeal of the Fee Award of the N.C. Indus. Comm'n In)

805 S.E.2d 486
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 1, 2017·No. No. 399P16·Published

Opinion

Mr. Paul C. Lawrence, Attorney at Law, For ADP TotalSource Fi Xi, Inc., et al.

Ms. Kari L. Schultz, Attorney at Law, For ADP TotalSource Fi Xi, Inc., et al.

Mr. M. Duane Jones, Attorney at Law, For ADP TotalSource Fi Xi, Inc., et al.

Mr. Henry E. Teich, Attorney at Law, For Saunders, Keith.

Mr. Mark T. Sumwalt, Attorney at Law, For Saunders, Keith.

Ms. Lauren H. Walker, Attorney at Law, For State.

Mr. Vernon Sumwalt, Attorney at Law, For State.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review, Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed as to issue number three only. The petition is denied as to any remaining issues:

"Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W82780 & W98474 Keith Saunders v. Adp Totalsource Fi Xi, Inc. (In re Appeal of the Fee Award of the N.C. Indus. Comm'n In), 805 S.E.2d 486 (N.C. 2017).

805 S.E.2d 486 (W82780 & W98474 Keith Saunders v. Adp Totalsource Fi Xi, Inc. (In re Appeal of the Fee Award of the N.C. Indus. Comm'n In)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.