W. X. Huber Co. v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 253, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1026
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in W. X. Huber Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Cust. Ct. 632
United States Customs Court·Decided October 1, 1953·No. No. 57499; protest 60676-K (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

This case was formerly reported in Abstract 49532. Subsequent to that decision, defendant’s motion for rehearing was granted, but the resulting record was so meager that the court, on its own motion, restored the case to the docket for all purposes. When the ease was called for trial, it was suspended pending decision in protest 132624-K, which ease was ultimately decided in favor of the plaintiff in A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476). In the present case, it was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of C. A. D. 476, supra. It was further stipulated that the protest was abandoned as to entry 3513. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the items in question covered by entry number 4400.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. X. Huber Co. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 253, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1026 (cusc 1953).

31 Cust. Ct. 253 (W. X. Huber Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.