W. Witmark Sons v. . Hall-Berwin Corporation
119 N.E. 1086, 223 N.Y. 576, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1275
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
W. Witmark Sons v. . Hall-Berwin Corporation, 119 N.E. 1086, 223 N.Y. 576, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1275 (N.Y. 1918).
119 N.E. 1086 (W. Witmark Sons v. . Hall-Berwin Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thahill Realty Co. v. Martin
88 Misc. 2d 520 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)
Belmar, Inc. v. Dixie Building Maintenance, Inc.
226 So. 2d 280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Eagle MacHine Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.
140 N.E.2d 756 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1957)
Zerder v. Friman Holding Co.
153 Misc. 225 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)