W. v. W.

Supreme Court of Delaware

W. v. W.

327 A.2d 754

DecidedSeptember 27, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 327 A.2d 754 (W. v. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W. v. W., 327 A.2d 754 (Del. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

327 A.2d 754 (1974)

Wife, W., Plaintiff Below, Appellant,
v.
Husband, W., Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted August 27, 1974. Decided September 27, 1974.

Walter L. Pepperman, II, and Robert F. Stewart, Jr., of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellant.

H. Alfred Tarrant, Jr., of Cooch & Taylor, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellee.

Before HERRMANN, Chief Justice, DUFFY, Associate Justice, and BROWN, Vice Chancellor.

*755 PER CURIAM:

This appeal puts in issue the jurisdiction of the Superior Court to order a division of property under 13 Del.C. § 1531(a)(2) on condition that plaintiff transfer her interest in corporate stock owned jointly by the parties. We conclude that the Superior Court has such jurisdiction for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Trial Judge. 307 A.2d 812 (1973).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

327 A.2d 754 (1974)

Wife, W., Plaintiff Below, Appellant,
v.
Husband, W., Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted August 27, 1974. Decided September 27, 1974.

Walter L. Pepperman, II, and Robert F. Stewart, Jr., of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellant.

H. Alfred Tarrant, Jr., of Cooch & Taylor, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellee.

Before HERRMANN, Chief Justice, DUFFY, Associate Justice, and BROWN, Vice Chancellor.

*755 PER CURIAM:

This appeal puts in issue the jurisdiction of the Superior Court to order a division of property under 13 Del.C. § 1531(a)(2) on condition that plaintiff transfer her interest in corporate stock owned jointly by the parties. We conclude that the Superior Court has such jurisdiction for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Trial Judge. 307 A.2d 812 (1973).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 A.2d 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-v-w-del-1974.

Opinion

Wife, W., Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Husband, W., Defendant Below, Appellee.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Wife, W., Plaintiff Below, Appellant,
v.
Husband, W., Defendant Below, Appellee.