W. V. Pangborne & Co. v. Wark & Co.
This text of 334 A.2d 247 (W. V. Pangborne & Co. v. Wark & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Having examined the record, we are of opinion that the parties to this appeal agreed to arbitrate disputes arising under the contract between them and that the claims which the appellee seeks to arbitrate are not excluded from the arbitration agreement by any provision of the Subcontract, including Article IX. See generally Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp., 460 Pa. 660, 331 A.2d 184 [filed January 27, 1975]; Borough of Ambridge Water Authority v. Columbia, Pa., 328 A.2d 498 (1974).
Decree affirmed. Costs on appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 A.2d 247, 460 Pa. 588, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-v-pangborne-co-v-wark-co-pa-1975.