W. Temple v. Commissioner

5 T.C.M. 763, 1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 91
United States Tax Court·Decided August 30, 1946·No. Docket No. 1327.·Unpublished

Opinion

W. T. Temple v. Commissioner.
W. Temple v. Commissioner
Docket No. 1327.
United States Tax Court
1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 91; 5 T.C.M. (CCH) 763; T.C.M. (RIA) 46210;
August 30, 1946

*91 Under the facts, held, a distribution on January 16, 1940 was not one in complete liquidation under section 115 (c), I.R.C., prior to the 1942 amendment, and the gain realized therefrom is taxable as ordinary gain.

Albert W. Taber, Esq., and Charles L. Claunch, Esq., Chattanooga Bank Bldg., Chattanooga, Tenn., for the petitioner. S. Earl Heilman, Esq., and Frank M. Thompson, Esq., for the respondent.

ARNOLD

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

ARNOLD, Judge: This case involves an income tax deficiency for the year 1940 in the amount of $5,765.92 as determined by respondent. The sole question is whether the sum of $22,750 received by the petitioner in January, 1940 from Mountain City Knitting Mills, a corporation, in exchange for 91 shares of stock in that corporation owned by petitioner constituted a distribution in partial liquidation as determined by respondent or was a distribution in connection with the complete liquidation of the corporation as contended by petitioner. The case was submitted on oral testimony and exhibits from which we make the following

Findings of Fact

Petitioner is an individual residing at No. 901 Vine Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee. His income tax return was filed with the collector of internal revenue for the District of Florida. Mountain City Knitting Mills (hereinafter referred to as the corporation) was a Tennessee corporation*93 organized in 1917 and was engaged in the manufacture of hosiery. Its place of business was Chattanooga, Tennessee. During the years 1917 and 1922, petitioner acquired 91 shares of common stock of the corporation at a cost of $7,000. On January 16, 1940 and for some time prior thereto, petitioner was president of the corporation, E. A. Magill treasurer and general manager, and William L. Magill, brother of E. A. Magill, secretary. These same parties and Bessie Magill and Sadie Magill, sisters of E. A. Magill and William L. Magill, constituted its board of directors. The sisters were not active as directors. For several years the stock of the corporation was owned as follows: petitioner - 91 shares; E. A. Magill - 201 shares; and William L. Magill - 43 shares, making a total of 335 shares outstanding on January 16, 1940. The corporation has held 65 other shares since about 1928 as treasury stock.

Petitioner was never active in the business. He had no office or desk at the mill. He had other bsiness interests and spent much of his time in Florida looking after his affairs there. E. A. Magill and William L. Magill, who were, with the exception of petitioner, the only stockholders, officers*94 and active directors of the corporation, decided in December 1939, that it was advisable to liquidate the corporation for the reasons that the operations for the past few years had not been profitable, William L. Magill's health had been bad, help was getting scarce, E. A. Magill "was getting older", the machinery was becoming obsolete, and to meet competition new machinery would be required and the prospects for successful continued operation did not justify the additional investment in the plant. The corporation had contracts for goods to be manufactured, putstanding contracts for the purchase of raw material, and real estate and machinery to dispose of. It was not known how long liquidation would take but it was the intention of the Magills to liquidate the corporation within such relatively short period of time as would be consistent with favorable market conditions and other circumstances. It was realized "it would take quite a little while to liquidate" unless sold as a going concern.

E. A. Magill asked petitioner to meet him and his brother at the Read House in Chattanooga January 16, 1940 where they met and had lunch together. At that meeting E. A. Magill told petitioner*95 of their intention to liquidate the corporation, and their reasons for so doing. After going over the affairs of the corporation it was estimated the stock was reasonably worth $250 per share and the petitioner agreed to accept that amount for his 91 shares. The corporation then acquired petitioner's stock for $22,750. It paid $7,750 of this amount by check of that date and gave its 90-day note for $15,000 which it paid on April 12, 1940. The certificates were assigned to "E. A. Magill Treasurer" to be held as treasury stock until retired. The certificates were marked "cancelled May 28, 1940." Petitioner handled the disposition of his 91 shares without legal advice.

At the annual meeting of the corporation on February 20, 1940 new officers and directors of the corporation were elected as follows: Directors - E. A. Magill, William L. Magill, (Miss) Sadie Magill - officers, E. A. Magill, president, treasurer and general manager; William L. Magill, vice-president and secretary.

At that meeting the minutes show a resolution was adopted which contained the following language:

It was moved, seconded and unanimously carried that the action of the Treasurer be approved in purchasing*96 the stock of Walter T. Temple for the company and that this stock be held as Treasury stock.

At the directors' annual meeting held on the same day, the directors by resolution also approved the action of the treasurer in purchasing petitioner's stock for the company, and that it be held as treasury stock.

Petitioner had no contact with the corporation after he surrendered his stock on January 16, 1940 and did not know that it had been treated as treasury stock. The matter of liquidation was not discussed with anyone outside the board of directors until sometime in April or May, 1940. Prior to May 27, 1940, E. A. Magill discussed it with Albert W. Taber, attorney for the corporation and sought to learn the proper procedure in liquidating the business. He asked Taber to suggest items of business to be transacted at a forthcoming meeting of the stockholders and directors relating to the liquidation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. Temple v. Commissioner, 5 T.C.M. 763, 1946 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 91 (tax 1946).

5 T.C.M. 763 (W. Temple v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haskell v. Commissioner
46 B.T.A. 164 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1942)