W. T. Royston Co. v. Mascuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

W. T. Royston Co. v. Mascuch

1 A.D.2d 1007, 153 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 1007 (W. T. Royston Co. v. Mascuch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W. T. Royston Co. v. Mascuch, 1 A.D.2d 1007, 153 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

It seems that compliance by the defendant with the order to produce the voluminous records called for might entail a hardship in the particular circumstances of this case. Order unanimously modified so as to insert the words "and essential” after the word "relevant” and, as so modified, affirmed. Should any controversy arise the Justice presiding in Special Term may make proper directions as required. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur—Botein, J. P., Rabin, Cox, Frank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It seems that compliance by the defendant with the order to produce the voluminous records called for might entail a hardship in the particular circumstances of this case. Order unanimously modified so as to insert the words "and essential” after the word "relevant” and, as so modified, affirmed. Should any controversy arise the Justice presiding in Special Term may make proper directions as required. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur—Botein, J. P., Rabin, Cox, Frank and Valente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 1007, 153 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-t-royston-co-v-mascuch-nyappdiv-1956.