W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone

196 So. 138, 239 Ala. 576, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 392
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 16, 1940·No. 7 Div. 628·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition of the W. T. Rawleigh Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of the W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone, 196 So. 137.

While not agreeing with the Court of Appeals that a proper judgment in such a case is not appealable, we deny the writ for other reasons stated by the Court of Appeals.

GARDNER, C. J.; and THOMAS, BOULDIN, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone, 196 So. 138, 239 Ala. 576, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 392 (Ala. 1940).

196 So. 138 (W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone
196 So. 137 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)