W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone

196 So. 138, 239 Ala. 576, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 392
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 16, 1940
Docket7 Div. 628
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 138 (W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone, 196 So. 138, 239 Ala. 576, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 392 (Ala. 1940).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition of the W. T. Rawleigh Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of the W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone, 196 So. 137.

While not agreeing with the Court of Appeals that a proper judgment in such a case is not appealable, we deny the writ for other reasons stated by the Court of Appeals.

GARDNER, C. J.; and THOMAS, BOULDIN, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Cone
196 So. 137 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 138, 239 Ala. 576, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-t-rawleigh-co-v-cone-ala-1940.