W. T. Grant Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

W. T. Grant Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 900

United States Customs Court·Decided April 13, 1966·No. No. P66/34; protests 59/17373, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests -consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests -consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

W. T. Grant Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 900 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

56 Cust. Ct. 900 (W. T. Grant Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related