W. T. Grant Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 900
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 13, 1966
DocketNo. P66/34; protests 59/17373, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 900 (W. T. Grant Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. T. Grant Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 900 (cusc 1966).

Opinion

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests -consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G. Joannou Cycle Co. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 172 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)
Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 466 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Cust. Ct. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-t-grant-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.