W. T. Grant Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

W. T. Grant Co. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 397, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 219

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1952

DocketNo. 56379; protests 904717-G (A), etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 397 (W. T. Grant Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W. T. Grant Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 397, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 219 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authorities the claims of the plaintiff were sustained as follows: (1) Certain items of the merchandise the same in all material respects as the gloves the subject of United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333), were held dutiable at 50 percent under the provision in paragraph 915 for gloves “made of fabric knit on other than a warp-knitting machine,” plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924; and (2) other items similar to those involved in May Co. et al. v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 227, T. D. 49336) were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph 915 as gloves, made in chief value of woven 'cotton fabric, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924. In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authorities the claims of the plaintiff were sustained as follows: (1) Certain items of the merchandise the same in all material respects as the gloves the subject of United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333), were held dutiable at 50 percent under the provision in paragraph 915 for gloves “made of fabric knit on other than a warp-knitting machine,” plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924; and (2) other items similar to those involved in May Co. et al. v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 227, T. D. 49336) were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph 915 as gloves, made in chief value of woven 'cotton fabric, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924. In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Cust. Ct. 397, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-t-grant-co-v-united-states-cusc-1952.