W. Scott v. Travelers Ins Co./ Pet of: 3rd Circuit
194 A.3d 1046
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 2018
Docket146 MM 2018
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 194 A.3d 1046 (W. Scott v. Travelers Ins Co./ Pet of: 3rd Circuit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
W. Scott v. Travelers Ins Co./ Pet of: 3rd Circuit, 194 A.3d 1046 (Pa. 2018).
Opinion
AND NOW , this 15th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Certification of Question of Law is GRANTED. This Court shall consider the following issue:
Whether, under Pennsylvania law, a contractual provision in a motor vehicle insurance policy that requires an insured to submit to an independent medical examination by a physician selected by the insurer, when and as often as the insurer may reasonably require, as a condition precedent to the payment of first -party medical benefits under that policy, conflicts with the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1796(a), and is therefore void as against public policy.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish a briefing schedule and list this case for oral argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sayles, S. v. Allstate Ins Co., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Scott, W. v. Travelers Ins Co., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
LOUGHERY v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
W.D. Pennsylvania, 2019
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 A.3d 1046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-scott-v-travelers-ins-co-pet-of-3rd-circuit-pa-2018.