W. Scott v. Travelers Ins Co./ Pet of: 3rd Circuit

194 A.3d 1046
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 2018·No. 146 MM 2018·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Certification of Question of Law is GRANTED. This Court shall consider the following issue:

Whether, under Pennsylvania law, a contractual provision in a motor vehicle insurance policy that requires an insured to submit to an independent medical examination by a physician selected by the insurer, when and as often as the insurer may reasonably require, as a condition precedent to the payment of first -party medical benefits under that policy, conflicts with the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1796(a), and is therefore void as against public policy.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish a briefing schedule and list this case for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. Scott v. Travelers Ins Co./ Pet of: 3rd Circuit, 194 A.3d 1046 (Pa. 2018).

194 A.3d 1046 (W. Scott v. Travelers Ins Co./ Pet of: 3rd Circuit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sayles, S. v. Allstate Ins Co., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Scott, W. v. Travelers Ins Co., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019