W. S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

W. S. v. State

353 So. 2d 181, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17188

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1977·No. No. 77-378·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

W. S., a juvenile, was charged by petition for delinquency with robbery. He takes this appeal from an order adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to the Division of Youth Services. The sole question presented is whether the charge of robbery was established by substantial competent evidence.

We agree with the appellant that there was not substantial competent evidence to support a finding of robbery. However, the record does support a finding that W. S. was guilty of larceny. Therefore, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency, and remand the cause to the juvenile court for modification of the order consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

W. S., a juvenile, was charged by petition for delinquency with robbery. He takes this appeal from an order adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to the Division of Youth Services. The sole question presented is whether the charge of robbery was established by substantial competent evidence.

We agree with the appellant that there was not substantial competent evidence to support a finding of robbery. However, the record does support a finding that W. S. was guilty of larceny. Therefore, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency, and remand the cause to the juvenile court for modification of the order consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed and remanded.

W. S. v. State, 353 So. 2d 181, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17188 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

353 So. 2d 181 (W. S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related