W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Yarbrough

Alabama Court of Appeals

W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Yarbrough

176 So. 835, 27 Ala. App. 595, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 154

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 5, 1937

Docket6 Div. 136.

StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 835 (W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Yarbrough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Yarbrough, 176 So. 835, 27 Ala. App. 595, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 154 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This is the second application for certiorari in this case. The first is reported in ante, p. 229, 169 So. 337.

At the second trial, additional evidence was introduced. The trial court found as a fact that Leslie Yarbrough was employed by W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Company at the time he was injured. The only question before us on this issue, which is the principal matter of controversy, is whether there was any legal evidence to support the findings of fact by the trial-court. We have carefully reviewed the record and the opinion of the trial court which clearly analyzes the testimony. The opinion here prevails that there is legal evidence in the record, which is set out in the opinion of the court below, that is. sufficient to support the conclusion reached. We are not called upon to weigh conflicting evidence in this proceeding. Other questions raised do not substantially affect the conclusion reached by the trial court.

Certiorari denied; judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This is the second application for certiorari in this case. The first is reported in ante, p. 229, 169 So. 337.

At the second trial, additional evidence was introduced. The trial court found as a fact that Leslie Yarbrough was employed by W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Company at the time he was injured. The only question before us on this issue, which is the principal matter of controversy, is whether there was any legal evidence to support the findings of fact by the trial-court. We have carefully reviewed the record and the opinion of the trial court which clearly analyzes the testimony. The opinion here prevails that there is legal evidence in the record, which is set out in the opinion of the court below, that is. sufficient to support the conclusion reached. We are not called upon to weigh conflicting evidence in this proceeding. Other questions raised do not substantially affect the conclusion reached by the trial court.

Certiorari denied; judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 So. 835, 27 Ala. App. 595, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-p-brown-sons-lumber-co-v-yarbrough-alactapp-1937.