W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 517

United States Customs Court·Decided December 13, 1965·No. No. 69689; protests 62/19042, 63/8292, and 63/14539 (Boston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. John H. Faunce, Philadelphia, Inc. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. John H. Faunce, Philadelphia, Inc. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.

W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 517 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

55 Cust. Ct. 517 (W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related