W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 391
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Cust. Ct. 89 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1956·No. No. 59811; protests 17597-4-K, etc. (Boston)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Angora rabbit hair similar in all material respects to that the subject of W. N. Proctor Company v. United States (35 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 391 (cusc 1956).
36 Cust. Ct. 391 (W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 89 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)