W. M. Stephens, on Behalf of Himself and Family v. The Panhandle and Sante Fe Railway Company
463 F.2d 421
Opinions
The trial court correctly determined that under the facts of this case it was without jurisdiction and properly dismissed appellant’s complaint seeking damages in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas. See Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 406 U.S. 320, 92 S.Ct. 1562, 32 L.Ed.2d 95 (1972).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
W. M. Stephens, on Behalf of Himself and Family v. The Panhandle and Sante Fe Railway Company, 463 F.2d 421 (5th Cir. 1972).
463 F.2d 421 (W. M. Stephens, on Behalf of Himself and Family v. The Panhandle and Sante Fe Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
406 U.S. 320 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party
431 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1970)