W. L. Watts v. H. D. Simpson

21 S.W.2d 1119
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 1929·No. No. 624.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was submitted on the record, neither party having filed briefs. Since the submission a written suggestion of fundamental error has been sent tbe court by appellant’s counsel. On submission day, appellee’s counsel appeared and orally requested the court to dismiss the appeal. This request was then orally granted.

It being discretionary with this court whether it dismiss the appeal or inspect the record for fundamental error [Haynes v. Radford Grocery Co. [Tex. Com. App.] 14 S.W. (2d) 811], we think it due appellee, whose attorney came in person to the court to make the request for dismissal, that we make cur ¡ruling orally expressed from the bench the formal order of this court.

The appeal will accordingly be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. L. Watts v. H. D. Simpson, 21 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1929).

21 S.W.2d 1119 (W. L. Watts v. H. D. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company
14 S.W.2d 811 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)