W. L. Sutphin Realty Co. v. Breinig

206 A.D. 713
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate notice of examination denied, with ten dollars costs. We think plaintiff is entitled to the examination sought. The defendant having stipulated on two occasions to adjourn the examination without reserving any right to question the propriety or regularity of the notice, clearly waived all objections to such examination, and is estopped from moving to vacate the notice (Schweinburg v. Altman, 131 App. Div. 795.) Notice of examination modified so as to make it returnable before the Supreme Court at Special Term, New York county. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. L. Sutphin Realty Co. v. Breinig, 206 A.D. 713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 713 (W. L. Sutphin Realty Co. v. Breinig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lubicz v. Rosen
54 A.D.2d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Burger v. Barnett
48 Misc. 2d 660 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Haas v. Rothenberg
6 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Mossew v. To Market, Inc.
3 A.D.2d 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Dooper
124 Misc. 411 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1925)