W. J. v. State

3 S.W. 479, 22 Tex. Ct. App. 692, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 1887·No. No. 2082·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Willson, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment final upon a forfeited bail bond. The bail bond was executed under a pretended indictment- which had been presented by a body of fourteen persons assuming to act as a grand jury. Such, pretended indictment was a nullity, and all process and proceedings thereunder were void. (Lott v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 627; McNeese v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App, 48; Swain and Turner v. The State, Id., 323; Williams v. The State, Id., 265.)

The judgment is reversed and the proceeding upon the bail bond is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. J. v. State, 3 S.W. 479, 22 Tex. Ct. App. 692, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22 (Tex. Ct. App. 1887).

3 S.W. 479 (W. J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pizzi v. State
469 S.W.2d 576 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
The City of Chicago v. Terminiello
79 N.E.2d 39 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1948)
Dunn v. State
53 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Harris v. State
279 S.W. 817 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
State v. Witt
55 P. 1053 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)