W. J. Laughlin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

203 F.2d 956
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 1953
Docket11727
StatusPublished

This text of 203 F.2d 956 (W. J. Laughlin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. J. Laughlin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 203 F.2d 956 (6th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged,, and decreed that the opinion of the Tax Court be adopted as the opinion of this-court on review, and that the decision appealed from be and is hereby affirmed in-accordance with such opinion and the findings of fact of the Tax Court

*957 Amended Order

The above cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing that during the calendar year of 1946, Edna V. Laughlin received dividends in the amount of $59.50 from securities owned by her, which amount she reported on her separate income tax return for that year, and it appearing that the Commissioner and the Tax Court erred in including the said amount in the income of petitioner, W. J. Laughlin, and it being agreed by the above parties that the inclusion of said amount as the income of W. J. Laughlin was a mistake, and the decision of the Tax Court having been affirmed in accordance with the opinion of that court; and counsel for petitioner having properly called the attention of the court to this mistake; and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is .ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order heretofore entered affirming the decision of the Tax Court be and is hereby amended, and that the decision of the Tax Court be affirmed with the exception of its conclusions with reference to the above dividends; and that the cause be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 F.2d 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-j-laughlin-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1953.