W. J. Dillner Transfer Company v. Arthur Richard McAndrew Jr.

Third Circuit

W. J. Dillner Transfer Company v. Arthur Richard McAndrew Jr.

328 F.2d 601, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6420

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 11, 1964

Docket14554

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 328 F.2d 601 (W. J. Dillner Transfer Company v. Arthur Richard McAndrew Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W. J. Dillner Transfer Company v. Arthur Richard McAndrew Jr., 328 F.2d 601, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6420 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the thorough opinion of Judge Marsh in the District Court, 226 F.Supp. 860 which makes it very clear that this appeal presents no justiciable controversy. We also agree that the failure to join the Interstate Commerce Commission in this action has resulted in the omission of an indispensable party thereto.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the thorough opinion of Judge Marsh in the District Court, 226 F.Supp. 860 which makes it very clear that this appeal presents no justiciable controversy. We also agree that the failure to join the Interstate Commerce Commission in this action has resulted in the omission of an indispensable party thereto.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F.2d 601, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-j-dillner-transfer-company-v-arthur-richard-mcandrew-jr-ca3-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack