W. J. Byrnes & Co. of New York v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 697
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 1958
DocketReap. Dec. 9077; Entry No. 911493
StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 697 (W. J. Byrnes & Co. of New York v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. J. Byrnes & Co. of New York v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 697 (cusc 1958).

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel—

* * * that the merchandise involved in this appeal consists of atomizers marked with the red letter “Z” by the Appraiser on the invoice.
That at the time of exportation thereof, such or similar atomizers were not being freely offered for sale for home consumption in France, or for export to the United States, or for sale in the principal market of the United States.
That at the time of exportation thereof the cost of production of such atomizers, as defined in Section 402 (f) of the aforesaid Act is as follows:
That as to the atomizers marked with the red letter “Z” the cost of production is 438 French francs, net packed, each.
This appeal for reappraisement is limited’to the aforesaid item.

On tbe agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in Section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the atomizers involved, and that such value was as set forth above.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, it is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Cust. Ct. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-j-byrnes-co-of-new-york-v-united-states-cusc-1958.