W. H. Mouser & Co. v. Tunnicliffe

145 So. 839, 107 Fla. 562, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2372
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 839 (W. H. Mouser & Co. v. Tunnicliffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. H. Mouser & Co. v. Tunnicliffe, 145 So. 839, 107 Fla. 562, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2372 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, ¡and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Bufobd, C.J. and Whitfield, Teebell, Beown and Davis, J.J., concur. Ellis, J., absent on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 839, 107 Fla. 562, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-h-mouser-co-v-tunnicliffe-fla-1933.