W. H. Ashley Silk Co. v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.
This text of 1912 OK 532 (W. H. Ashley Silk Co. v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the petition. Counsel for defendant in error, in their brief, do not controvert the contention of counsel for plaintiff in error on the merits, but contend that, inasmuch as the appeal was taken prior to the entry of final judgment against the pleader, the same must be dismissed, and cite Grunawalt v. Grunawalt, 24 Okla. 756, 104 Pac. 905, as an authority to that effect. We do not think that case is in point. The case of Wesley et al. v. Diamond et al., 26 Okla. 170, 109 Pac. 524, is more analogous. In the latter case it was held:
“Under section 6067, Comp. Laws 1909, an order that involves the merits of an action or some part thereof may be reversed, vacated, or modified by the Supreme Court before the final judgment is rendered in the cause in the trial court.”
Section 6067, silpra, specifically provides that an appeal lies from an order which sustains or overrules a demurrer.
The judgment of the court below must be reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1912 OK 532, 125 P. 449, 33 Okla. 348, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-h-ashley-silk-co-v-oklahoma-fire-ins-co-okla-1912.