W. G. Ward Lumber Co. v. American Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

55 Pa. Super. 147, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 332
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 13, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 101·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

While some of the assignments of error present questions that are not entirely free from doubt, we are not [155] prepared to say that there is any error suggested that would justify a reversal of the judgment.

In the opinion filed by the learned trial judge, Foed, J., refusing to grant a new trial and to enter judgment n. o. v. the questions involved in this appeal are fully reviewed and rightly decided. The disputed facts in the case were clearly and adequately submitted to the jury, and the verdict was warranted by the evidence adduced in the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. G. Ward Lumber Co. v. American Lumber & Manufacturing Co., 55 Pa. Super. 147, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 332 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).

55 Pa. Super. 147 (W. G. Ward Lumber Co. v. American Lumber & Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. G. Ward Lumber Co. v. American Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
93 A. 470 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)