W. G. Cornell Co. v. McKiever
This text of 214 A.D. 738 (W. G. Cornell Co. v. McKiever) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, pursuant to rules 113 and 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disburse[739]*739ments, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The contract between the parties was in writing, and parol evidence is inadmissible to vary its terms. (Delehanty v. Dunn, 151 App. Div. 695; Gurski v. Doscher, 112 id. 345.) The pleadings and the other papers used upon the motion show that no issue was presented as to performance. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-g-cornell-co-v-mckiever-nyappdiv-1925.