W. Enright v. Commissioner

4 T.C.M. 1102, 1945 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 8
United States Tax Court·Decided December 19, 1945·No. Docket No. 6473.·Unpublished

Opinion

W. F. Enright, E. H. Lawhon, Edna Campbell, Frances Potter Willman, Moses Apple, Nate Block, William Abramson, C. A. Enos, E. C. Cook, L. Paul Forgrave, Lorren W. Garlichs, Henry Garvey, A. R. Goetz and Flora T. Goetz, Alexander Hamilton, E. G. Huddleston, Katie Neipp, Mary U. Neipp, T. M. Paul, William R. Seaman, Harry A. Smith, W. A. Thomson, R. A. Walker, Marion Land and William F. Kirkpatrick, doing business as R. L. Campbell Associates v. Commissioner.
W. Enright v. Commissioner
Docket No. 6473.
United States Tax Court
1945 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 8; 4 T.C.M. (CCH) 1102; T.C.M. (RIA) 45377;
December 19, 1945
Richard L. Douglas, Tootle-Lacy Bank Bldg., St. Joseph 2, Mo., for the petitioners. Loyal E. Keir, for the respondent.

DISNEY

Memorandum and Findings of Fact and Opinion

DISNEY, Judge: The Commissioner determined deficiencies as follows:

For the year ended
June 30,
19411942
Income tax$3,215.65$3,833.66
Declared value excess prof-
its tax3,039.772,703.30
Excess profits tax2,056.43673.36
The questions to be determined are whether the petitioners*9 were engaged in business during the taxable years as an association taxable as a corporation, and in the alternative, whether, because of failure to file capital stock tax returns, the association is subject to declared value excess-profits tax at the maximum rates, as determined by the Commissioner, or is entitled to now file such returns and to a recomputation of such tax based thereon.

Findings of Fact

All of the petitioners above named are residents of St. Joseph, Missouri. W. F. Enright has been for about ten years past the president of the Empire Trust Company of that city. E. H. Lawhon is president and principal owner of Lawhon Construction Company, engaged in the contracting business.

Negotiations between R. L. Campbell and Phillips Petroleum Company, a Delaware corporation and owner of an oil and gas lease executed April 1, 1939, by William A. Schock and Dora B. Schock, his wife, covering the west half of the Northeast Quarter and the East half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 29 and Lot 4, and Southeast Quarter of Section 20-1N-16E, all in Richardson County, Nebraska, resulted in the drafting of an "Assignment and Contract" dated July 6, 1940, to be entered into*10 within ten days from date by and between Campbell and the company. Under the terms of the agreement, the company assigned and transferred to Campbell, subject to a one-eighth royalty payable to the lessors and a two-eighths overriding royalty reserved to itself, all of its right, title and interest in and to the Schock oil and gas lease insofar only as it covered Lot 4, a tract of approximately 23 acres. Campbell was to commence the actual drilling of a well for oil production on or before 30 days from date, the entire cost of drilling, testing, completing and equipping the well to produce to be borne by Campbell. In the event the well to be drilled became a commercial producer, the company agreed to assign to Campbell all of its right, title and interest in the Schock oil and gas lease insofar as it covered the West half of the Northeast Quarter, Section 29, a tract of 80 acres, whereupon and within 30 days after the completion of the well on Lot 4, Campbell was to commence the drilling of a well thereon, the entire cost of drilling, testing, completing and equipping the well to produce to be borne by Campbell. The company reserved the right at all times and from time to time to purchase*11 any or all oil produced from the wells drilled on the premises assigned at the posted market price of the major purchasing companies for oil of like grade and gravity in the same vicinity and to purchase all gas and casinghead gas produced from the premises under the terms of the company's standard form of casinghead gas contract. It also reserved the right, in the event Campbell had an offer from a third party ready, able and willing to purchase all or any part of the leasehold estate involved, to purchase such interest in the lease at the same price and under the same terms and conditions offered by the prospective purchaser.

In order to finance the drilling of the well it was necessary for Campbell to arrange for the assignment of a portion of his prospective interest in the Schock lease. Because of the provisions of paragraph 8 contained in the assignment and contract of Phillips Petroleum Company, in which it reserved the right to purchase any interest for which Campbell had an offer of purchase from a third person, Campbell obtained from the company under date of July 13, 1940, its consent to the proposed assignment by Campbell, in part as follows:

"We hereby approve your*12 assignment of this seven-eighths (7/8) interest in Lot 4 of Section 20-1N-16E to your associates, provided such assignment or assignments are made expressly subject to all the terms and conditions of said Assignment and Contract of July 6, 1940, and provided further that it is distinctly understood that your remaining interest and the interest assigned to your associates remain subject to the provisions of said Paragraph 8, and that no further sales can be made without first giving this company an opportunity to purchase the interest you desire to sell under the terms and provisions of said paragraph."

<

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. Enright v. Commissioner, 4 T.C.M. 1102, 1945 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 8 (tax 1945).

4 T.C.M. 1102 (W. Enright v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burk-Waggoner Oil Assn. v. Hopkins
269 U.S. 110 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Morrissey v. Commissioner
296 U.S. 344 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Swanson v. Commissioner
296 U.S. 362 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Helvering v. Combs
296 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates
296 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Everts v. Commissioner
38 B.T.A. 1039 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1938)
Stantex Petroleum Co. v. Commissioner
38 B.T.A. 269 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1938)