W. E. Linthicum & Sons, Inc. v. Kelly Construction Co.

97 S.E.2d 863, 246 N.C. 203, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 398
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 1, 1957·Published

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

The principal contractor is a necessary party to an action to enforce the lien of a subcontractor. Lumber Co. v. Hotel Co., 109 N.C. 658, 14 S.E. 35. Hence at the threshold of this appeal plaintiff is confronted with an insurmountable obstacle of not having the contractor in court as a party to this action.

So holding, it is not deemed expedient at this time to venture upon discussion of evidence in the case which might prejudice the case, in the event plaintiff should elect to proceed again under G.S. 1-25.

For reason stated the judgment from which appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. E. Linthicum & Sons, Inc. v. Kelly Construction Co., 97 S.E.2d 863, 246 N.C. 203, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 398 (N.C. 1957).

97 S.E.2d 863 (W. E. Linthicum & Sons, Inc. v. Kelly Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lookout Lumber Co. v. Mansion Hotel & Belt Railway Co.
14 S.E. 35 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)