W. E. Blume, Inc. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
This text of 265 A.D. 1062 (W. E. Blume, Inc. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint shows that a former defendant, Roxbury, was a contractor, plaintiff a subcontractor, and the appellant an owner, all within the meaning of sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Lien Law. Under such facts, no lien may attach if the owner has discharged his obligation to the contractor, and it appears that that has been done. The fact that an owner has knowledge of or acquiesces in a subcontractor’s performing work on the owner’s property is not in itself sufficient to create a right to a lien, where there is a fully performed contract for the same work between the owner and the contractor. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 1062, 39 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-e-blume-inc-v-postal-telegraph-cable-co-nyappdiv-1943.