W. E. Blume, Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

W. E. Blume, Inc. v. City of New York

241 A.D. 722

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Determination modified by granting a new trial, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant in this court to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to direct judgment for the defendant when plaintiff had no opportunity to offer evidence in rebuttal of the testimony in support of the allegations pleaded as defenses and counterclaims in the answer. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination modified by granting a new trial, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant in this court to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to direct judgment for the defendant when plaintiff had no opportunity to offer evidence in rebuttal of the testimony in support of the allegations pleaded as defenses and counterclaims in the answer. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

W. E. Blume, Inc. v. City of New York, 241 A.D. 722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 722 (W. E. Blume, Inc. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.